Stanislaus ScholarWorks
http://hdl.handle.net/10211.3/118191
2024-03-29T05:58:17ZBeyond the classroom: a descriptive social epidemiological study comparing two school sites in Modesto, California by investigating the relationship among place, health, and education
http://hdl.handle.net/10211.3/215114
Beyond the classroom: a descriptive social epidemiological study comparing two school sites in Modesto, California by investigating the relationship among place, health, and education
Bullock, Campbell John
Modesto City Schools, in Modesto, California, has standardized test scores that are below the state average in California. Scores are even lower for specific schools in the district. Most research regarding student achievement only looks at the educational context, but it is critical to take a more expansive view that includes the larger community. In order to investigate factors that could impact educational success a descriptive social epidemiological case study was utilized to describe an elementary school and its surrounding attendance area in one of the most impoverished areas of Modesto. This site, Orville Wright Elementary, was compared to a second school site and community that was more affluent. Our research question was: What are the socio-structural factors within the Orville Wright Elementary attendance zone and community that may be affecting the health and well-being of the students and how does this compare to these same factors within the Lakewood attendance zone? Descriptive analysis included the use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) tools to compare one school district attendance area to the other and focused on five indicators associated with child health and well-being necessary for educational success. These indicators are socioeconomic status and poverty, sufficient housing, violence and crime levels, availability of and access to health care and community resources. A range of sources were used to collect quantitative data for this study including the California Department of Education, the American Community Survey, and the City of Modesto Police Department. Results indicated that even though the attendance areas are less than three miles apart, there were substantial differences between all study indicators. Authors then applied the theories of freedoms and unfreedoms (Sen, 1995) and deformed choices (Nussbaum, 2001) to analyze our findings and interpret what these results mean for children in Orville Wright and other communities facing similar challenges. We conclude by offering recommendations to improve the education of the students at Orville Wright and other schools throughout the district.
0007-06-18T00:00:00ZCare in the classroom: teacher and student perspectives in high and low classes
http://hdl.handle.net/10211.3/215113
Care in the classroom: teacher and student perspectives in high and low classes
Ceballos-Lopez, Karla
Tracking, or its most modern form, ability grouping (Lucas & Berends, 2002), can cause students to experience different levels of care and to have different opportunities to learn (Moller & Stearns, 2012; Oakes, 2005). Research (Diamond, Randolf, & Spillane, 2004) suggests that teachers’ sense of care varies widely between the various academic classes and tracks found today in America’s public schooling. This differing sense of responsibility and differential experience of care can cause the academic rigor, instructional quality, and the classroom climate to change dramatically per academic class (Diamond et al., 2004; Donaldson, LeChasseur, & Mayer, 2016; Moller & Stearns, 2012; Oaks, 2005). Thus, students in low and high tracked classes have widely different experiences. The purpose of this study was to understand if and how tracking leads to differences in student experiences related to care and preparation in school within the academic tracks at the various levels. Also, we sought to understand how teachers understand their sense of care for their students. Results indicate that students do experiences care differently but these differences are intricate and multilayered. Furthermore, these differences are based on several factors such as level in school, track placement, gender of the teacher, years of teaching experience for the teacher. More importantly, differences in care are heavily due to teachers’ varied understanding of what care is and how it should be presented to students in and, at times, outside the classroom. Results are further explained with quantitative and qualitative findings pieced together and tied to related literature. Research implications, limitations, and conclusions are also discussed.
0006-03-18T00:00:00ZCare in the classroom: teacher and student perspectives in high and low classes
http://hdl.handle.net/10211.3/215112
Care in the classroom: teacher and student perspectives in high and low classes
Woodbridge, Justin
Tracking, or its most modern form, ability grouping (Lucas & Berends, 2002), can cause students to experience different levels of care and to have different opportunities to learn (Moller & Stearns, 2012; Oakes, 2005). Research (Diamond, Randolf, & Spillane, 2004) suggests that teachers’ sense of care varies widely between the various academic classes and tracks found today in America’s public schooling. This differing sense of responsibility and differential experience of care can cause the academic rigor, instructional quality, and the classroom climate to change dramatically per academic class (Diamond et al., 2004; Donaldson, LeChasseur, & Mayer, 2016; Moller & Stearns, 2012; Oaks, 2005). Thus, students in low and high tracked classes have widely different experiences. The purpose of this study was to understand if and how tracking leads to differences in student experiences related to care, and preparation in school within the academic tracks at the various levels. Also, we sought to understand how teachers understand their sense of care for their students. Results indicate that students do experiences care differently but these differences are intricate and multilayered. Furthermore, these differences are based on several factors such as level in school, track placement, gender of the teacher, years of teaching experience for the teacher. More importantly, differences in care are heavily due to teachers’ varied understanding of what care is and how it should be presented to students in and, at times, outside the classroom. Results are further explained with quantitative and qualitative findings pieced together and tied to related literature. Research implications, limitations and conclusions are also discussed.
0006-04-18T00:00:00ZCare in the classroom: teacher and student perspectives in high and low classes
http://hdl.handle.net/10211.3/215111
Care in the classroom: teacher and student perspectives in high and low classes
Volk, Reid
Tracking, or its most modern form, ability grouping (Lucas & Berends, 2002), can cause students to experience different levels of care and to have different opportunities to learn (Moller & Stearns, 2012; Oakes, 2005). Research (Diamond, Randolf, & Spillane, 2004) suggests that teachers’ sense of care varies widely between the various academic classes and tracks found today in America’s public schooling. This differing sense of responsibility and differential experience of care can cause the academic rigor, instructional quality, and the classroom climate to change dramatically per academic class (Diamond et al., 2004; Donaldson, LeChasseur, & Mayer, 2016; Moller & Stearns, 2012; Oaks, 2005). Thus, students in low and high tracked classes have widely different experiences. The purpose of this study was to understand if and how tracking leads to differences in student experiences related to care, and preparation in school within the academic tracks at the various levels. Also, we sought to understand how teachers understand their sense of care for their students. Results indicate that students do experiences care differently but these differences are intricate and multilayered. Furthermore, these differences are based on several factors such as level in school, track placement, gender of the teacher, years of teaching experience for the teacher. More importantly, differences in care are heavily due to teachers’ varied understanding of what care is and how it should be presented to students in and, at times, outside the classroom. Results are further explained with quantitative and qualitative findings pieced together and tied to related literature. Research implications, limitations and conclusions are also discussed.
0006-04-18T00:00:00Z